
Paul Casella
PHILADELPHIA — It's been almost two and a half months since Phillies outfielder Nick Castellanos spoke his thoughts to supervisor Rob Thomson after being lifted for a defensive alternative on June 16 in Miami.
That late-game transfer hadn't occurred once more since … till Friday evening’s 2-1 victory over the Braves.
With the Phillies clinging to a one-run lead getting into the ninth inning, Thomson approached the home-plate umpire to inform him of some lineup modifications. It wasn't simple to speak the strikes on condition that the ballpark had gone darkish in preparation for nearer Jhoan Duran's electrical entrance.
However by the point the lights got here again on at Residents Financial institution Park, Harrison Bader — who was not within the beginning lineup — was trotting out to play middle subject. Brandon Marsh had shifted to left and Max Kepler went to proper.
Castellanos, who was the second-to-last batter within the backside of the eighth, was not within the sport.
"He makes close to the final out within the eighth inning," Thomson defined, "so we put Bader in as a result of he's the perfect defender we've obtained."
Appears easy sufficient. After all, it's not that simple given what occurred the final — and solely — time Thomson lifted Castellanos for defensive functions.
That earlier occasion got here towards the Marlins on June 16, when Castellanos made “inappropriate” comments to Thomson after the supervisor changed him with Johan Rojas within the eighth inning of a two-run sport. Castellanos was benched the next day, ending his consecutive video games began streak at 236.
So, how did it go this time round?
"I feel we're all on the level now the place we're all-in," Thomson mentioned. "No matter is finest for the staff to win a sport that evening, we're all-in. Examine your ego on the door and let's go."
Once more, it may not be that simple.
Not solely has Thomson reopened the door on swapping out Castellanos late in shut video games, however the longtime on a regular basis outfielder has additionally been disregarded of the beginning lineup 4 occasions up to now 13 video games in favor of Kepler.
Requested how a lot of an adjustment that’s at this level in his profession, Castellanos mentioned: "It's an enormous adjustment."
Has it been tough?
"Sure," he mentioned.
How does he cope with that?
"The perfect I can," Castellanos mentioned.
This explicit defensive swap got here on an evening when Castellanos had accounted for one of the vital pivotal defensive performs of the sport. With runners on the corners and one out in a 1-1 sport within the fifth, Braves designated hitter Marcell Ozuna lined a ball to proper subject.
Castellanos settled beneath it, then — with Matt Olson breaking for house — the outfielder made an on-target throw to the plate for an inning-ending double play that prevented the go-ahead run from scoring.
"He performed effectively," Thomson mentioned. "He actually did."
Does this occurring on an evening Castellanos made that sort of play make it all of the extra irritating for him?
"Sure," Castellanos mentioned once more.
After all, the Phillies are wanting on the greater image.
Castellanos entered Friday evening with -12 Outs Above Average (OAA) this season, in accordance with Statcast. That ranked final amongst 113 certified outfielders. He was additionally getting a leap that was -2.8 feet worse than average — eighty fifth out of 86 certified outfielders in that class.
Castellanos' -13 DRS (Defensive Runs Saved) additionally checked in at third worst amongst outfielders. In the meantime, Bader's 17 DRS are tied for the third most amongst outfielders this season.
Total, Bader has 75 OAA courting to his first full season in 2018. That’s 22 greater than every other energetic outfielder throughout that span. In that very same timeframe, Castellanos has -74 OAA. That’s 17 fewer than every other outfielder. In truth, just one different participant has even -40 OAA throughout that span — and that participant is now the Phillies’ designated hitter (Kyle Schwarber, -57 OAA).
So the query isn't a lot in regards to the logic behind the transfer itself. If something, the one query is why it hadn't occurred since June 16.
"That state of affairs hasn't come up, to inform you the reality," Thomson mentioned.
Now, the query turns into, "Will it occur once more?" the subsequent time it comes up?