A mind-boggling achievement in a classic video game reveals wider lessons about the extreme limits of human performance, says cognitive scientist Tom Stafford.<\/b>
For decades, it was a feat that was considered impossible.
In the dying days of 2023, US teenager Willis Gibson \u2013 online handle "Blue Scuti" \u2013 "beat" the Nintendo Entertainment System version of the video game Tetris<\/a>, which was first released in 1989.
The original Tetris designers thought it couldn't be done \u2013 the game is designed to play endlessly. The pieces fall faster and faster until a player is overwhelmed. To beat the game, a player has to achieve scores so high that the game's memory banks overload and it crashes. Victory is achieved because the computer simply cannot continue.
As a professor of cognitive science, I'm interested in how people acquire expertise, particularly in video games<\/a>, so when Gibson performed his dizzying feat, it immediately caught my eye. How this 13-year-old did it tells us a lot about how the limits of human performance are changing in the digital age.
Previously, the NES version of Tetris had only been beaten by AI<\/a>. A specially designed program was able to perceive, near-instantly, the state of the Tetris game and select actions as fast as the console could register them. It played tirelessly, never making an error \u2013 something that seemed far beyond the constraints of mere human performance.
At the time, 2021, the AI-Tetris player was able to show humans previously uncharted levels of the game. Like physics at the limits of a black hole, the reality of Tetris begins to bend at the higher levels. The speed suddenly doubles at level 29, a level few humans reach and fewer survive for long. When the score counter breaks 1 million, the digits begin to be replaced by letters, and then finally glyphs from the Tetris graphic set. Eventually, the colours of the blocks warp and change, some levels are all violent pink, others have blocks so dark you can hardly see them \u2013 especially at the speed you need to act to survive.
This is the context for the game Gibson streamed on 21 December 2023<\/a>, in which he played the game at increasingly frenetic speeds for 40 minutes. In the process, he set new world records for high score, levels played and lines cleared. Eventually, he was rewarded with the crash that signals he had done the impossible \u2013 beaten the game.
You may also like:<\/i>
The achievement is real, but the importance is far beyond the realm of classic arcade games and those who love them. What Gibson did, and how he did it, gives general lessons for how people learn, and how the limits of human performance are extended.
To understand why, consider that Tetris is a community, as well as a game. Gibson didn\u2019t just pick up an old console, he joined a living tradition. There are thousands of players dedicated to Tetris on the NES, the platform on which it was first officially released in North America. As well as the players, there are streamers, bloggers, theorists discussing strategy, and record-chasers competing to outmatch each other. There is even the Classic Tetris World Championship<\/a>, held annually in Portland, Oregon.
Tetris is famously compelling<\/a>, but it is the community that ensures new players are drawn into the hobby, despite the proliferating number of alternatives out there.
Communities provide encouragement, and another crucial ingredient for accelerating human potential \u2013 inspiration. Communities are living laboratories of ideas and experimentation, where different people can try out new things, and successes can be passed along. Scientists study this social learning under the label "cultural evolution<\/a>". Although some other animals do this, humans excel at it. It provides the seeds of culture, as different communities evolve different practices to suit their immediate environment.
Successful new skill techniques spread in learning communities. Take the Fosbury Flop<\/a>, a high jumping technique popularised by Dick Fosbury when he won gold for the US in the 1968 Olympics. Fosbury\u2019s gold winning jump was 2.24 metres (7ft 4.19in), but this height was achieved \u2013 and in many cases smashed \u2013 by every single competitor at the 2020 Olympics in Tokyo, all using the Flop technique.\u00a0
What Fosbury did for the high jump, the internet and AI are doing for nearly every skill imaginable. Recently, the internet has put rocket fuel in the engine of cultural transmission. Whether you want to learn to code, or just want to watch a video on how to fix your dishwasher, it's easier than ever to copy new skills. Since the advent of home chess engines there has been a massive generational improvement in chess skill, which sees today's players playing better chess than at any point in history<\/a>. Even criminals employ social learning \u2013 one recent news story blamed Tiktok for a rise in a particular style of car thefts<\/a>.
In Tetris, a crucial innovation has been a new way of holding the controller \u2013 called "rolling<\/a>", where players drum the bottom of the pad into a finger or thumb hovering just above the keypad. It allows players to input commands faster than by pressing with a single finger. Despite the game's 34-year history, rolling only became popular in recent years, spreading through the community of streamers and competition Tetris players. As is often the way, it is the youngest members of a community who recognise useful innovation. Gibson began playing Tetris at age 11 and used the rolling technique in his record breaking run.
Lots of discussion around artificial intelligence focuses on domains where human skills might become obsolete, but it is a mistake to think that human performance is a stationary target.\u00a0 As Gibson's record-breaking achievement showed, we constantly look to the outer limits and, by reaching, extend our grasp.
The moral is that pressing the frontiers of human skill is a consequence of continual collective innovation, as well as of remarkable individuals. Humans are a species defined by our ability to learn, and in the digital age there is more and more potential to push into uncharted territories of performance in all aspects of art, science and culture \u2013 Tetris included.
* Tom Stafford is professor of cognitive science at the University of Sheffield, UK. He writes a newsletter called <\/i>Reasonable People<\/i><\/a>.<\/i>
—
If you liked this story,\u00a0<\/i>sign up for The Essential List newsletter<\/i><\/a>\u00a0\u2013 a handpicked selection of features, videos and can't-miss news delivered to your inbox every Friday.<\/i>
Join one million Future fans by liking us on <\/i>Facebook<\/i><\/b><\/a>, or follow us on <\/i>Twitter<\/i><\/b><\/a> or <\/i>Instagram<\/i><\/b><\/a>.<\/i>
It's been dubbed "the greatest construction project in the world", and will usher in a new way for travellers to experience Mexico's ancient Maya sites. So why is it so controversial?
Researchers believe the ability to predict the future is a skill that can be learned and developed.
While looks might matter for first impressions, there are other qualities that win people's hearts.
With tourists around the world behaving badly in their quest to get the perfect Insta shot, some destinations and tour operators are working to get visitors to go beyond the selfie.
When you think of cork, you might think of that pop of champagne on New Year's Eve \u2013 but some of this versatile tree bark will also keep astronauts safe as they head to the Moon.
Copyright 2024 BBC. All rights reserved.\u00a0\u00a0<\/i>The BBC <\/i>is not responsible for the content of external sites.<\/i>\u00a0Read about our approach to external linking.<\/b><\/a>
Beta Terms<\/b> By using the Beta Site, you agree that such use is at your own risk and you know that the Beta Site may include known or unknown bugs or errors, that we have no obligation to make this Beta Site available with or without charge for any period of time, nor to make it available at all, and that nothing in these Beta Terms or your use of the Beta Site creates any employment relationship between you and us. The Beta Site is provided on an \u201cas is\u201d and \u201cas available\u201d basis and we make no warranty to you of any kind, express or implied.
In case of conflict between these Beta Terms and the BBC Terms of Use these Beta Terms shall prevail.<\/p>\n