If the just lately rumoured specs for the brand new Nvidia RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 graphics playing cards are certainly true we’re a flagship GPU with a terrifying quantity of processing energy and a second-tier chip that is already pissing off a whole lot of gaming people.\u00a0<\/p>\n

\n
GeForce RTX 5090PG144\/145-SKU30GB202-300-A121760FP32512-bit GDDR7 32G600WSeptember 26, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
GeForce RTX 5080PG144\/147-SKU45GB203-400-A110752FP32256-bit GDDR7 16G400W September 26, 2024<\/a><\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n
The most recent spec ‘leak’ has come from kind of dependable X leaker, kopite7kimi, and tells a narrative of 1 almighty RTX 5090, with a specs bump that offers it a mouth-watering quantity of TSMC-built tech in a single graphics card. And reportedly nonetheless a two-slot reference card at that.<\/p>\n
\n
It will make the RTX 4090 appear like a clown card in additional methods than one. That Founders Version is a mammoth graphics card that also makes me chuckle each single time I slot it into the check rig within the workplace, such is its huge, novelty-GPU measurement. That is going to be going in opposition to what’s reportedly going to be a dual-slot card will make it look much more outsized. And that is earlier than you get to speak in regards to the conversely mammoth spec of the reported new GPU. With 21,760 CUDA cores (efficient FP32 items)\u2014that is nonetheless not utilising the complete GB202 complement of cores\u2014it is a hefty 33% improve in core rely over the RTX 4090, which itself had over 50% extra cores than the RTX 3090.<\/p>\n
Then the brand new Nvidia Blackwell flagship GeForce card is reportedly going to be flexing with a 512-bit aggregated reminiscence bus and a full 32 GB of GDDR7 reminiscence. And, guess what, that makes for a 33% improve in each reminiscence and reminiscence bus, too. The elevated energy numbers (presumably the TGP of the cardboard) suggests a 600 W peak, which, if you happen to’ve been following the maths, additionally hits that seemingly magic 33% mark.<\/p>\n
I ponder what kind of efficiency enchancment Nvidia goes to be touting with its new card? Certainly it is received to do higher than 33%? In our testing, the RTX 4090 was, on common, 72% sooner than the RTX 3090 in our 4K gaming checks. So, I am kinda hoping it is extra in step with the reminiscence bandwidth uplift as a substitute.<\/p>\n
As a result of one of many few numbers which does not observe the plus-one-third development is reminiscence bandwidth the RTX 5090 is supposedly going to have at its disposal. With each that 512-bit bus and the usage of 28 Gbps GDDR7, we’re 1,792 GB\/s by way of uncooked reminiscence bandwidth, that is a fairly incroyable 78% improve over the RTX 4090.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Fairly how Nvidia goes to squeeze all that additional energy right into a dual-slot GPU design, I actually do not know. The rumours are that we’re solely a modest change in course of node\u2014N4P versus N4 for the Ada era\u2014in order that’s not going to get you working a lot cooler. So, we might be a really particular Founders Version certainly, probably some sort of liquid-cooled beastie.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
\n
Maintain updated with an important tales and the perfect offers, as picked by the PC Gamer staff.<\/p>\n<\/section>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
Probably the third-party GPU distributors are nonetheless more likely to be tacking monstrous coolers to their very own variations, and I doubt subsequent RTX 50-series Founders Version playing cards would get an analogous remedy. Although, who is aware of.<\/p>\n
I kinda do not wish to take into consideration how a lot this factor goes to price, although. The RTX 4090 was a relative cut price in comparison with the pricing will increase that occurred throughout the remainder of the RTX 40-series vary, however I wrestle to consider that in a world the place it has zero competitors Nvidia is not going to cost its flagship GPU anyplace south of $2,000. If we’re going by the 33% numbers round $2,100 makes some sense\u2026<\/p>\n
Provided that it is twice the GPU of the rumoured RTX 5080, which is more likely to ship on the similar $1,000 mark because the RTX 4080 Tremendous, that every one kinda follows.\u00a0<\/p>\n
\n
Swipe to scroll horizontally
\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n\n
Header Cell – Column 0 <\/span><\/th>\n Nvidia RTX 5090*<\/th>\n Nvidia RTX 5080*<\/th>\n Nvidia RTX 4090<\/th>\n Nvidia RTX 4080 Tremendous<\/th>\n<\/tr>\n<\/thead>\n
GPU<\/td>\n GB202-300<\/td>\n GB203-400<\/td>\n AD102-300<\/td>\n AD103-400<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
CUDA Cores<\/td>\n 21,760<\/td>\n 10752<\/td>\n 16384<\/td>\n 10240<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
SMs<\/td>\n 170<\/td>\n 84<\/td>\n 128<\/td>\n 80<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Reminiscence<\/td>\n 32 GB GDDR7<\/td>\n 16 GB GDDR7<\/td>\n 24 GB GDDR6X<\/td>\n 16 GB GDDR6X<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Reminiscence bus<\/td>\n 512-bit<\/td>\n 256-bit<\/td>\n 384-BIT<\/td>\n 256-bit<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Reminiscence bandwidth<\/td>\n 1792 GB\/s<\/td>\n 896 GB\/s<\/td>\n 1008 GB\/s<\/td>\n 736 GB\/s<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
TGP<\/td>\n 600 W<\/td>\n 400 W<\/td>\n 450 W <\/td>\n 320 W<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n
Row 7 – Cell 0 <\/span><\/td>\n * rumoured specs<\/td>\n Row 7 – Cell 2 <\/span><\/td>\n Row 7 – Cell 3 <\/span><\/td>\n Row 7 – Cell 4 <\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
So sure, that RTX 5080. The rumours are usually not sort, and neither has been the response to its personal specs. With a reported miserly 5% improve in CUDA core rely over the RTX 4080 Tremendous this new card is not wanting notably thrilling. With the identical 256-bit bus and 16 GB of GDDR7 VRAM there’s little or no that is getting my techie coronary heart pounding about that make up.\u00a0<\/p>\n
It seems to be prefer it’s relying virtually completely on a rise in reminiscence bandwidth and a ton extra energy jammed by way of its silicon to have the ability to achieve the efficiency lead over the RTX 4080 Tremendous it must ship a very tantalising improve prospect. I imply, the scuttlebutt means that it should beat the gaming efficiency of the RTX 4090 by a contact\u2014although given these specs I am struggling to see it\u2014however it’s nonetheless going to be a troublesome promote given the hole between the RTX 5080 and RTX 5090 is broad sufficient you possibly can toss an asteroid by way of.<\/p>\n
\n
\n
\n
$\"Reactions$ <\/picture><\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>
(Picture credit score: X)<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n
As ever, we have to take these specs with a dose of the salty stuff till we get official affirmation from Nvidia itself on its new playing cards, and it performs them classically near its chest proper as much as launch. However they really feel<\/em> proper. In a method that, y’know, feels kinda improper. No-one desires the RTX 5080 to look so gimped, with the attainable exception of AMD who could be tempted out of high-end GPU retirement if the goal is probably achievable.<\/p>\n
Although we nonetheless do not know when the playing cards themselves will launch. From the individuals I’ve spoken too, I’ve lengthy had a sense it will be this yr in some type, however then Nvidia has no cause to must launch the RTX 50-series in 2024. It has no competitors, and the RTX 40-series are nonetheless doing the products proper now. However even when the RTX 5090 and RTX 5080 are to launch within the subsequent three months there’s an opportunity that these numbers aren’t closing, particularly these energy figures. We noticed an entire host of TGP hypothesis forward of the ultimate 450 W reveal of the RTX 4090, so there may nonetheless be some motion even when these leaked specs are appropriate as of proper now.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n