PC hardware is an ever-changing landscape full of ideas that manage to propel the industry forward. However, there are times when great ideas can quickly wither away into obscurity. And there are plenty of examples of PC hardware fads that came and went, to the point where it\u2019s easy to forget that a particular bit of tech came out at all.<\/p>\n

And sometimes it\u2019s fun to take a look back through the trends of tech and see what didn\u2019t work out. We can reminisce about some bits of PC hardware that were nothing more than popular fads. Now fads aren\u2019t necessarily a bad thing, since you never know what\u2019s going to stick the landing. But we can all think back to a purchase that, in hindsight, was a bad decision. So let\u2019s take a walk through memory lane and take a look at some of the biggest fads in PC hardware history.<\/p>\n

\u00a0<\/p>\n

Imagine having multiple graphics cards<\/h2>\n

Right off the bat, we\u2019re getting into the weeds of PC hardware. Nvidia\u2019s SLI (Scalable Link Interface) first appeared in 2004 and allowed the user to hook up multiple graphics cards to the same PC. Using SLI, you could have two, three, or even four graphics cards in your rig working at once. It seems crazy to think about owning just one RTX 3080 Ti right now, let alone multiple, even as the supply situation steadily improves. Unfortunately, Nvidia phased out SLI with the RTX 20 Series cards, so that dream won\u2019t become a reality.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

(Image credit: Nvidia)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

In an SLI setup, each graphics card renders a different part of the screen. For a 2-way SLI system, one card would render the top horizontal half of the screen, while the other would render the bottom half. This method is known as split frame rendering, and there\u2019s also alternate frame rendering where each GPU would handle its own set of frames in a sequence. This gave each graphics card a much easier job to do. Setting this up could be extremely expensive though, especially if you wanted to use the best cards on the market. Even then, not all games supported SLI, so you may have been stuck using just one graphics card anyway. SLI was a neat idea in concept and did produce some cool results, but realistically wasn\u2019t viable.<\/p>\n

3D displays with headaches as an added bonus<\/h2>\n

The best way to read through this section is via a 3D monitor. Then and only<\/em> then can you appreciate the pointlessness that was stereoscopic 3D. This is also perhaps the most egregious fad in PC hardware history since 3D displays weren\u2019t cheap. 3D gaming as a whole has been dead in the water for some time now. In fact, the last mainstream appearance for this tech was in 2018\u2019s Shadow of the Tomb Raider<\/em>.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

(Image credit: Philips)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

The true nail in the coffin for stereoscopic 3D was simply that no one used it. Nvidia did try and make the technology a little more official with its 3D Vision tech, but that didn\u2019t amount to much either. Even Nintendo thought it was a good idea when it made the 3DS. But I don\u2019t know of a single person that actually used the 3D slider on that system, which kind of proves how pointless it all is. Simply put, 3D is as gimmicky as it gets, and it\u2019s not a thing that most gamers actually used or wanted. It was extremely short-lived too, first becoming popular in gaming around 2009, and then sputtering out by 2013.<\/p>\n

The Steam Machine, AKA Valve\u2019s failed console<\/h2>\n

Valve still dominates the PC games distribution scene, but hardware has always been a bit of a blind spot for the company. Of course, these days we\u2019ve the Steam Deck, which is a seriously impressive bit of hardware. However, Valve\u2019s clearly wanted a spot in the realm of hardware for some time, and it made some major mistakes along the way. The Steam Machine is one of its biggest failures.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

(Image credit: Dell)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Steam Machines were essentially just pre-built gaming PCs that ran Steam OS. It\u2019s a Linux-based operating system, similar to what\u2019s in use on the Steam Deck today. This operating system is designed around making PC gaming as straightforward and \u201cconsole-like\u201d as possible. And this becomes a problem for a gaming PC that doesn\u2019t function much like a computer. The Steam Machine was a gaming PC marketed towards people that already had gaming PCs. And it wasn\u2019t enough to bring console gamers over to the platform. It simply didn\u2019t make sense at the time and is still a puzzling idea to this day. However, it did pave the way for the Steam Deck, which is essentially the same thing but in a handheld format and with more support from other developers.<\/p>\n

The Steam Controller, Valve\u2019s second flop<\/h2>\n

The Steam Machine flopped hard, but it isn\u2019t as sad as the sudden end of the Steam Controller. If you just take a look at this thing, you can tell why it might not have sold so well. Instead of making a more conventional controller, Valve decided to try something more unique. The inclusion of two massive touchpads and the strange positioning of buttons didn\u2019t leave an amazing first impression.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

(Image credit: Valve)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

To be fair to the Steam Controller, the touchpads are well-designed. As you move your thumb over the touchpad, small vibrations offer tactile feedback. This is also a feature of the Steam Deck\u2019s touchpads. Ultimately, The biggest tragedy of the Steam Controller is that it was actually well-designed.<\/p>\n

People often think back on the controller fondly for its uniqueness and for how well suited it was in some PC titles. But that didn\u2019t stop the controller from underselling to the point that Valve discontinued production in 2019, only four years after its launch in 2015. However, to Valve\u2019s credit, the controller is still supported to this day.<\/p>\n

Mouse DPI doesn\u2019t really matter<\/h2>\n

This PC hardware fad might be a bit controversial to some, especially to those who are in the competitive gaming scene. But the honest truth is that the DPI (dots-per-inch) of a gaming mouse don\u2019t matter that much. DPI basically just dictates how sensitive a mouse is on a hardware level. The higher the DPI, the more the mouse cursor will move on the screen. Very high DPI settings can make your cursor dart all over the screen with the slightest movement, while keeping it at a lower setting will slow things down. There\u2019s a lot more nuance beyond that, but those are the basics.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

DPI does have a genuine purpose, and it\u2019s important to dial it in correctly. But it\u2019s entirely based on personal feel, and no one can tell you what the right amount of DPI is. The real fad here is the marketing for gaming mice advertised with DPI numbering in the tens of thousands. This is entirely marketing nonsense, as no one is realistically going to use these settings.<\/p>\n

In fact, check out the DPI and sensitivity settings of some of the top esports players. Each of them has slightly different settings, but you\u2019ll rarely see their DPI over 4,000, and even that is on the high end. The bottom line is that DPI does have a purpose, but it\u2019s not as important as some would lead you to believe.<\/p>\n

Tempered glass looks cool, but it isn\u2019t<\/h2>\n

This next fad isn\u2019t trying to call out anyone\u2019s aesthetic preferences. Tempered glass panels on the fronts of desktop cases do make a certain amount of sense. After all, PC components look cool, and it makes sense that owners will want to see their flashy components. Especially if you have RGB lighting and the inside of your case looks like an out-of-season Christmas tree. We all love that sort of thing deep down, but it can actually be a pretty bad idea in the long run. But not how you might think.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

(Image credit: CiT)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

It all stems from air flow, and one of the most important things you can do for your PC is keep it cool. Many cases are designed to have plenty of vents, gaps, and spaces for air to come and go. The problem with glass is that air can\u2019t get through it, so bad design placement can result in a massive wall on the front of your PC that stops enough cool air from getting in.<\/p>\n

Companies allegedly do this for design choices, not to mention that glass front panels can further dampen operational noise of the PC. Some companies are finally getting past this bad trend though. You can find cases with tempered glass front panels that mitigate airflow restriction with clever intake designs. Corsair\u2019s iCue 5000X we reviewed is actually a good example of a case that uses tempered glass correctly.<\/p>\n

However, you can still find plenty of cases with tempered glass front panels that end up making cooling a nightmare. Tempered glass may look cool, but at the end of the day, it often favors style over function. Considering the high costs, power consumption, and resulting heat output of modern graphics cards, choosing a case with restrictive airflow is not a mistake someone wants to make.<\/p>\n

Sorry to say, but streaming PCs are a fad too<\/h2>\n

These days, PCs geared entirely towards hosting a stream are sort of overkill. Back in the days of quad-core CPUs, a streaming PC made plenty of sense. After all, PCs back then couldn\u2019t quite manage to drive a game on high settings with decent frame rates, while also encoding that feed in a program like OBS. It was too much for CPUs to handle, and this is where a streaming PC would come in to lighten the load.<\/p>\n

<\/p>\n

(Image credit: Nvidia)<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

Some streamers still use streaming PCs for their setups, and there\u2019s no real problem with that. But these days, it\u2019s not really necessary with modern CPUs. 12th gen Intel CPUs and Ryzen 5000 processors are more than capable of handling a game and video encoding at the same time. Sure, if you wanted to play games and stream at a 4K resolution with high frame rates, a streaming PC could help take off some of the weight. But it isn\u2019t really worth it at this point, especially since Twitch has a bit rate cap of\u00a0 6,000kb\/s, which is only enough for a 1080p broadcast. Streaming PCs just aren\u2019t really necessary in most cases these days, and are too expensive to justify getting.<\/p>\n

Gone and forgotten<\/h2>\n

It\u2019s easy to forget about some of PC hardware\u2019s biggest fads. And while there were certainly some that were worse than others, these all eventually led to better products in the end. The nature of PC hardware is that companies constantly need to iterate on ideas, and this sometimes translates to good products. On the other hand, it can lead to tech that doesn\u2019t stick the landing for more than a very short period of time.<\/p>\n

At the end of the day, it\u2019s important to remember the trends and fads of the past. Companies need to remember as well, so the same mistakes are not repeated. And consumers get to laugh at some of the horrible purchases they made in the past. Because let\u2019s be honest, we\u2019ve all been there.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
Source link <\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

PC hardware is an ever-changing landscape full of ideas that manage to propel the industry forward. However, there are times when great ideas can quickly wither away into obscurity. And there are plenty of examples of PC hardware fads that came and went, to the point where it\u2019s easy to forget that a particular bit […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":13579,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"fifu_image_url":"https:\/\/d30xqvs6b65d10.cloudfront.net\/wp-content\/uploads\/2022\/03\/zotac2-1620x1080-1.jpg","fifu_image_alt":"","footnotes":""},"categories":[567],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-13578","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-featured-news"],"yoast_head":"\n