The Digital Fund Switch Act (EFTA) and Regulation E apply to an digital fund switch (EFT) that authorizes a “monetary establishment” to debit or credit score a shopper’s account. Whereas a “monetary establishment” historically refers to a financial institution, credit score union, or financial savings affiliation, it’s effectively established that “monetary establishments” may embody non-bank entities that instantly or not directly maintain an account belonging to a shopper, or that subject an entry machine and agree with a shopper to offer EFT providers. Pay as you go accounts and “different shopper asset accounts” into which funds may be deposited by or on behalf of the patron and which have options of deposit or financial savings accounts, additionally meet Regulation E’s definition of “account.” Some online game accounts used to buy digital objects from a number of sport builders or gamers might fall beneath the definition of “different shopper asset accounts.”
In April 2024, the Client Monetary Safety Bureau (CFPB) issued a report on the banking and cost providers changing into extra prevalent in gaming and digital worlds the place shoppers spend billions of {dollars} yearly to buy gaming property—typically by changing U.S. {dollars} to digital currencies. The report raised issues about shopper protections and the unsure allocation of duty for errors or fraud when a buyer’s digital foreign money or property are misplaced by way of hacking, account theft, scams, or unauthorized transactions.
Following that report, on January 10, 2025, the CFPB issued a proposed interpretive rule that goals to increase the scope of Regulation E’s protection to online game platforms that maintain shoppers’ cash for private, household, or family use and deal with these sport platforms as if they’re account holders identical to a financial institution or credit score union for Regulation E functions.
The interpretive rule expands on what constitutes an EFT, notably for brand spanking new cost strategies akin to peer-to-peer cost platforms and digital wallets. This enlargement consists of transfers initiated by way of apps and cost techniques tied to shopper accounts. The secret’s whether or not the funds act like or are used like cash, such that they’re accepted as a medium of alternate, a measure of worth, or a way of cost.
The interpretive rule would additionally make clear that online game corporations working on-line marketplaces or in any other case facilitating EFTs could be topic to the patron safety provisions beneath Regulation E, particularly investigation and error decision obligations. Moreover, the interpretive rule would require a online game firm to reveal the phrases and situations of EFT providers.
The CFPB is soliciting feedback from the gaming group for this proposed interpretive rule, which have to be despatched through electronic mail to [email protected] on or earlier than March 31, 2025.
Foley & Lardner is well-versed within the areas of gaming, e-sports, digital property, and monetary regulatory regulation. Please contact us with any questions or issues in these areas.
Authors
Sectors
Follow Areas
Of Counsel
Senior Counsel
Affiliate
Affiliate
We glance past the regulation to concentrate on the continuously evolving calls for going through our purchasers.
© 2025 Foley & Lardner LLP
Legal professional Commercial
Photographs of individuals is probably not Foley personnel.